data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bede0/bede090b689e56764a55ef01bfccf620d0c1022a" alt="0_imagemaker-18"
EFL pundits break down a “seismic” moment for Stoke City and Mark Robins, predict the points needed for survival, and pick sides in the goal of the season debate.
Stoke City’s crucial win could have far-reaching implications, with pundit George Elek highlighting the significance of the way they secured it, not just the victory itself.
Trailing 1-0 to Swansea in the 61st minute at the bet365 Stadium, Stoke were looking down the barrel of defeat, with Swansea sitting comfortably on 40 points, eight ahead of the Potters. But a dramatic turnaround saw Wouter Burger equalize, Bae Junho give them the lead, and Lewis Baker seal a 3-1 win with an incredible long-range goal that could contend for Championship goal of the season.
By the final whistle, Swansea dropped back to 37 points, while Stoke climbed to 35, now six points clear of the relegation zone with a game in hand. Swansea’s poor run led to the sacking of boss Luke Williams just days later.
On the *Not The Top 20* podcast, Ali Maxwell sided with Josh Windass in the goal of the season debate, backing Sheffield Wednesday’s goal from his own half. But Elek felt Baker’s goal was more significant, both in terms of quality and the context of the game.
He praised the trajectory and execution of Baker’s strike, pointing out its impact in what felt like a pivotal moment for Stoke’s season. Elek emphasized that Stoke’s dramatic comeback, scoring in the final moments, could be a major morale booster for both the players and fans. Meanwhile, Swansea’s frustration was evident, as they were so close to a victory that would have almost secured their survival.
Elek also weighed in on survival prospects, suggesting that a points total of 46 or 47 might be enough this season. Swansea’s failure to secure points has pulled them back into the relegation battle, while Stoke now seem poised to push forward.
Leave a Reply