In order to get Premier League Attacker, Liverpool will have to pay the “club record fee.”

Wolverhampton, England, February 28th 2024: Pedro Neto 7 Wolves in action during the FA Cup football match between Wolverhampton Wanderers and Brighton and Hove Albion at Molineux stadium in Wolverhampton, England Natalie Mincher/SPP PUBLICATIONxNOTxINxBRAxMEX Copyright: xNataliexMincher/SPPx spp-en-NaMi-IMG_4281

Targets for Liverpool’s summer season: WOLVES ATTACKER MAY BE UNLIKELY DUE TO “CLUB RECORD FEE”

Attention is now focused on Liverpool’s summer transfer ambitions as the start of Arne Slot’s Liverpool era gains traction.

As things stand, the Reds seem to be targeting a defender and a forward, with connections to players like Willian Pacho of Frankfurt, Leny Yoro of Lille, and Johan Bakayoko of PSV continuing to surface in recent days.

However, a well-known name has also reappeared recently: Pedro Neto, the forward for Wolves, is reportedly being linked to Liverpool as a summer transfer.

However, a recent story by The Telegraph suggests that this move may already be called into question.

WOLVES’ WORLD RECORD DEMANDS The Portuguese forward is expected to fetch at least £60 million from Wolves, which would create a club record for the Midlands team.

This information is based on The Telegraph. At about £50 million, Matheus Nunes’ transfer to Manchester City, Liverpool’s rivals, presently holds the record for the team’s largest departure.

The Reds could be able to afford this cost, even though it’s not entirely out of the ordinary, but I have a suspicion that they might think there is better value available elsewhere on the market.

Still, Manchester City is intrigued by Neto and would not think twice to spend big money on him if they felt he was the right player.

The Reds could be able to afford this cost, even though it’s not entirely out of the ordinary, but I have a suspicion that they might think there is better value available elsewhere on the market. Still, Manchester City is intrigued by Neto and would not think twice to spend big money on him if they felt he was the right player.

That would essentially free up that left-wing position for Neto to take immediately, though there would be some debate in that regard given Cody Gakpo’s final-season performances.

But one of Neto’s greatest assets is also his adaptability; the Portuguese striker can play from the right as well and may eventually take Mohamed Salah’s spot as a backup or perhaps a replacement.

He would be a perfect fit for the Reds’ tactical play because of his straightforward style of play, amazing speed, and flair.

In comparison to Johan Bakayoko of PSV, who has also been connected to a move to Anfield, he also poses a far greater direct goal threat.

This season, he has managed 13 direct goal involvements for Gary O’Neil’s team despite multiple injuries.

It’s possible that Neto’s terrible injury history will deter Michael Edwards and Liverpool from making a move for him. Since the beginning of the 2017–18 season, the forward has shockingly missed 123 matches.

A total of 99 of them absences have occurred since the 2020–21 season began. His knee ailment kept him out of 52 games that season, and in 2022–2023 he also missed 27 games due to an ankle issue.

Pedro Neto: Is It True? Several of the best clubs in England are interested in Pedro Neto because he is without a doubt an incredible player.

But all of those teams, particularly Liverpool and Newcastle, who cannot afford to spend so much money on a player who plays just 25 games a season, find themselves in a difficult situation as a result of his injury history.

Although the £60 million price is a lot of money for a player with those problems, I would at least urge Liverpool to move forward with him if Wolves’ position changes in any way.

I believe it would be obvious if the price dropped to something like £40–45 million, but the £60 million price could be too much to bear.

Get related news on

sportchannel.co.uk

Be the first to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.


*